日本語View as Markdown

Molecular hydrogen attenuates neuropathic pain in mice.

水素水の経口摂取がマウスの神経障害性疼痛を軽減する

animal study hydrogen-rich water positive

Abstract

A mouse partial sciatic nerve ligation model was used to evaluate whether hydrogen-rich drinking water could reduce neuropathic pain. Mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia were assessed over 21 days using the von Frey and plantar tests, respectively. Ad libitum access to saturated hydrogen water significantly reduced both pain indicators. Administration restricted to the induction phase (days 0–4) alleviated both allodynia and hyperalgesia, whereas administration only during the maintenance phase (days 4–21) reduced hyperalgesia but not allodynia. Immunohistochemical analysis of 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal and 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine in the spinal cord and dorsal root ganglion confirmed that hydrogen suppressed ligation-induced oxidative stress. These findings suggest that hydrogen water ingestion may offer a practical approach to managing neuropathic pain.

Mechanism

Hydrogen-rich water suppresses oxidative stress markers (4-HNE and 8-OHdG) in the spinal cord and dorsal root ganglion, thereby reducing both the induction and maintenance of neuropathic pain following sciatic nerve ligation.

Bibliographic

Authors
Kawaguchi M, Satoh Y, Otsubo Y, Kazama T
Journal
PLoS One
Year
2014
PMID
24941001
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0100352
PMC
PMC4062523

Tags

Delivery:水素水経口投与 Mechanism:ヒドロキシルラジカル消去 炎症抑制 脂質過酸化 酸化ストレス 活性酸素種

Delivery context

Hydrogen-rich water is a low-risk delivery route, but the achievable systemic hydrogen dose is bounded. For clinical applications, inhalation is the most efficient route; inhalation, however, carries explosion risk, and concentration matters (empirical LFL of 10% applies to inhalation environments; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

Safety notes

Hydrogen-rich water is a low-risk delivery route, but the achievable systemic hydrogen dose is bounded. For clinical applications, inhalation is the most efficient route; inhalation, however, carries explosion risk, and concentration matters (empirical LFL of 10% applies to inhalation environments; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

See also:

Cite as: H2 Papers — PMID 24941001. https://h2-papers.org/en/papers/24941001
Source: PubMed PMID 24941001