日本語View as Markdown

Impact of molecular hydrogen treatments on the innate immune activity and survival of zebrafish (Danio rerio) challenged with Aeromonas hydrophila.

水素富化水浸漬がAeromonas hydrophila感染ゼブラフィッシュの自然免疫応答と生存率に及ぼす影響

animal study hydrogen-rich water positive

Abstract

This study examined the effects of hydrogen-rich water (HRW) immersion on zebrafish (Danio rerio) challenged with the pathogenic bacterium Aeromonas hydrophila. Fish subjected to HRW immersion showed improved post-infection survival rates compared to controls, and bacterial proliferation within the host was markedly reduced. Gene expression analysis in the spleen, kidney, and liver revealed downregulation of pro-inflammatory mediators including IL-1β, IL-6, and NF-κB, alongside upregulation of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10. These findings represent the first investigation of HRW effects in bacterially infected fish and suggest potential applications of molecular hydrogen in aquaculture disease management.

Mechanism

HRW suppresses pro-inflammatory gene expression (NF-κB, IL-1β, IL-6) while upregulating the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 in multiple organs, thereby modulating innate immune responses and limiting bacterial proliferation in zebrafish.

Bibliographic

Authors
Hu Z, Wu B, Meng F, Zhou ZZ, Lu H, Zhao H
Journal
Fish Shellfish Immunol
Year
2017
PMID
28630014
DOI
10.1016/j.fsi.2017.05.066

Tags

Delivery:水素水経口投与 Mechanism:免疫調節 炎症抑制 酸化ストレス 活性酸素種

Delivery context

Hydrogen-rich water is a low-risk delivery route, but the achievable systemic hydrogen dose is bounded. For clinical applications, inhalation is the most efficient route; inhalation, however, carries explosion risk, and concentration matters (empirical LFL of 10% applies to inhalation environments; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

Safety notes

Hydrogen-rich water is a low-risk delivery route, but the achievable systemic hydrogen dose is bounded. For clinical applications, inhalation is the most efficient route; inhalation, however, carries explosion risk, and concentration matters (empirical LFL of 10% applies to inhalation environments; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

See also:

Cite as: H2 Papers — PMID 28630014. https://h2-papers.org/en/papers/28630014
Source: PubMed PMID 28630014