日本語View as Markdown

Heat-retention effects of hydrogen-rich water bath assessed by thermography for humans.

サーモグラフィを用いた水素富化水浴の保温効果に関する臨床的検討

human observational study hydrogen bath positive

Abstract

A thermographic clinical trial involving 24 healthy participants compared heat retention after hydrogen-rich water bathing (hydrogen concentration 185–548 μg/L; oxidation-reduction potential −167 to −91 mV) versus ordinary water bathing under identical conditions (41°C, 10 minutes). Infrared imaging at 30 and 60 minutes post-bath revealed greater surface temperature maintenance in the hydrogen-rich group across multiple body regions, ranked in descending order: abdomen, upper legs, arms, hands, and feet. Fingertip capillary thickness measurements indicated vascular dilation was more pronounced after hydrogen-rich bathing, pointing to a circulatory-promoting effect beyond simple thermal retention. Heat retention showed weak-to-moderate positive correlations with subcutaneous fat, total body fat, and BMI, and an inverse correlation with skeletal muscle ratio, while basal metabolic rate showed little association. These findings suggest hydrogen-rich water bathing enhances post-bath warmth across diverse body regions through blood flow promotion reflected by capillary expansion.

Mechanism

Hydrogen-rich water bathing appears to dilate peripheral capillaries and enhance blood circulation, producing post-bath heat retention that exceeds what thermal effects alone would predict.

Bibliographic

Authors
Kato S, Takada Y, Miwa N
Journal
J Therm Biol
Year
2021
PMID
33454037
DOI
10.1016/j.jtherbio.2020.102805

Tags

Delivery:水素浴 Mechanism:血管内皮機能 酸化ストレス

Delivery context

Hydrogen bathing has reports of localized effects, but for systemic hydrogen intake the most efficient route is inhalation. Inhalation carries explosion risk (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

Safety notes

Hydrogen bathing has reports of localized effects, but for systemic hydrogen intake the most efficient route is inhalation. Inhalation carries explosion risk (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

See also:

Cite as: H2 Papers — PMID 33454037. https://h2-papers.org/en/papers/33454037
Source: PubMed PMID 33454037