日本語View as Markdown

Homeostatic and endocrine responses as the basis for systemic therapy with medical gases: ozone, xenon and molecular hydrogen.

医療ガス(オゾン・キセノン・分子状水素)の恒常性維持および内分泌応答に基づく全身作用の比較検討

review mixed routes not assessed

Abstract

This review compares the physiological activities of three medical gases—ozone (O₃), xenon (Xe), and molecular hydrogen (H₂)—representing oxidizing, inert, and reducing agents, respectively. Analysis of published and original data indicates that all three gases can influence the neuroendocrine system by modulating hormone production or secretion through the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal, hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid, and hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axes, as well as via gastrointestinal pathways. Repeated administration over time leads to the establishment of conditioned homeostatic reflexes, rendering the physiological modulations predictable and stable. The review frames these phenomena within a Pavlovian conditioned-reflex model, suggesting that anticipatory adaptive responses underlie the systemic effects observed with repeated gas exposure.

Mechanism

Medical gases including H₂ modulate hormone secretion via hypothalamic-pituitary axes (adrenal, thyroid, gonadal) and gastrointestinal pathways; repeated administration establishes conditioned homeostatic reflexes that stabilize physiological regulation.

Bibliographic

Authors
Nazarov EI, Khlusov IA, Noda M
Journal
Med Gas Res
Year
2021
PMID
34213500
DOI
10.4103/2045-9912.318863
PMC
PMC8374457

Tags

Mechanism:免疫調節 炎症抑制 酸化ストレス 活性酸素種

Delivery context

This study combines multiple delivery routes. As a general principle, the most efficient route for routine hydrogen intake is inhalation. Inhalation carries explosion risk (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

Safety notes

This study combines multiple delivery routes. As a general principle, the most efficient route for routine hydrogen intake is inhalation. Inhalation carries explosion risk (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

See also:

Cite as: H2 Papers — PMID 34213500. https://h2-papers.org/en/papers/34213500
Source: PubMed PMID 34213500