日本語View as Markdown

The Landscape of Smart Biomaterial-Based Hydrogen Therapy.

スマートバイオマテリアルを基盤とした水素デリバリーシステムの研究動向

review mixed routes not assessed

Abstract

This review systematically examines biomaterial-based strategies for delivering molecular hydrogen, addressing the fundamental limitation that systemic H2 gas administration fails to achieve sufficient local concentrations at target lesion sites. The authors outline the historical development of biomaterial-based hydrogen carriers, stimuli-responsive release mechanisms, and underlying therapeutic pathways. Hydrogen generated from these biomaterials demonstrates multiple modes of action: scavenging reactive oxygen species (ROS) and suppressing lipid peroxidation (LPO), inhibiting disease-initiating danger signals such as pro-inflammatory cytokines, adenosine triphosphate (ATP), and heat shock proteins (HSP), and functioning as signaling molecules to modulate key regulatory pathways. The review also evaluates current opportunities and obstacles in this field and highlights priority directions for translating biomaterial-based hydrogen delivery into clinical practice.

Mechanism

Hydrogen released from biomaterials scavenges ROS and suppresses lipid peroxidation, inhibits pro-inflammatory cytokines, ATP, and heat shock proteins, and acts as a signaling molecule to regulate key disease-associated pathways.

Bibliographic

Authors
Xu MJ, Wu G, You Q, Chen X
Journal
Adv Sci (Weinh)
Year
2024
PMID
39166484
DOI
10.1002/advs.202401310
PMC
PMC11497043

Tags

Delivery:吸入投与 点滴投与 Mechanism:ヒドロキシルラジカル消去 炎症抑制 脂質過酸化 酸化ストレス 活性酸素種

Delivery context

This study combines multiple delivery routes. As a general principle, the most efficient route for routine hydrogen intake is inhalation. Inhalation carries explosion risk (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

Safety notes

This study combines multiple delivery routes. As a general principle, the most efficient route for routine hydrogen intake is inhalation. Inhalation carries explosion risk (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

See also:

Cite as: H2 Papers — PMID 39166484. https://h2-papers.org/en/papers/39166484
Source: PubMed PMID 39166484