Sixty-minute inhalation of molecular hydrogen decreases blood oxygen saturation but does not alter autonomic cardiac regulation at rest in healthy females: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study.
健康な女性における60分間の水素ガス吸入が安静時の血中酸素飽和度および自律神経性心臓調節に与える影響:無作為化二重盲検プラセボ対照クロスオーバー試験
Abstract
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study enrolled 20 physically active healthy females (mean age 22.1 ± 1.6 years) to examine how 60 minutes of molecular hydrogen inhalation affects blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) and heart rate variability (HRV) under resting conditions. Participants completed two sessions—hydrogen or ambient air placebo—separated by a 7-day washout. Continuous monitoring over the 60-minute inhalation period revealed a statistically significant reduction in SpO2 in the hydrogen condition (95.9 ± 1.0%) relative to placebo (96.7 ± 0.7%; p ≤ 0.007); however, this difference was judged to lack clinical relevance. Neither time-domain nor frequency-domain HRV indices showed significant between-condition differences (all p ≥ 0.32). The data indicate that resting autonomic cardiac regulation is unaffected by hydrogen inhalation and that the modest SpO2 decline does not disrupt homeostatic stability.
Mechanism
Dilution of inspired oxygen partial pressure by hydrogen gas may account for the modest SpO2 decline observed; no direct effect on autonomic nervous system activity was detected under resting conditions.
Bibliographic
- Authors
- Grepl P, Krejčí J, McKune A, Botek M
- Journal
- Can J Physiol Pharmacol
- Year
- 2026 (2026-01-01)
- PMID
- 41401441
- DOI
- 10.1139/cjpp-2025-0228
Tags
Delivery context
In air, molecular hydrogen is reported to be combustible across approximately **4% (LFL, lower flammability limit) to 75% (UFL, upper flammability limit)**. Among high-concentration hydrogen inhalers, 66% output sits inside this range, and even pure-hydrogen (100%) output forms a 4–75% concentration-gradient layer at the device–air boundary (the UFL 75% paradox). Engineering principle would therefore call for operation below LFL (the classical 4%); that figure, however, was measured under closed, pre-mixed, static conditions. For the open, dynamic inhalation environment, the empirical value reported in the literature is **10%**, which is the figure referenced in practice as the operating ceiling. The 66% / 100% output devices are recorded in the Japanese Consumer Affairs Agency accident-information database, and from these considerations are not recommended.
Safety notes
See also: