日本語View as Markdown

Status quo, challenges and future directions of hydrogen medicine.

水素医学の現状・課題・将来展望:生物学的機序・代謝挙動・デリバリー技術の包括的レビュー

review mixed routes not assessed

Abstract

Molecular hydrogen (H₂) possesses several distinctive properties—broad-spectrum anti-inflammatory activity, favorable biosafety profile, and high tissue permeability—that underpin its potential in diseases driven by inflammation and oxidative stress. This review synthesizes current knowledge across three domains: (1) biological mechanisms, including the identification of H₂ molecular targets and the challenge of accounting for its diverse cellular effects; (2) metabolic behavior, encompassing detection methodologies and experimental evidence—obtained with a newly developed H₂ molecular bioprobe—demonstrating H₂'s capacity to cross biological barriers; and (3) delivery strategies, tracing the evolution from passive H₂ carrier materials to hydrolytic and catalytic H₂-generating systems designed to improve efficacy. The review concludes by delineating priority directions for future research in hydrogen medicine.

Mechanism

H₂ is proposed to selectively scavenge highly reactive oxygen species—including hydroxyl radicals and peroxynitrite—through interaction with specific molecular targets, thereby broadly suppressing inflammatory signaling cascades.

Bibliographic

Authors
Chen SL, Zeng L, He Q
Journal
Fundam Res
Year
2026
PMID
41971791
DOI
10.1016/j.fmre.2025.06.014
PMC
PMC13069841

Tags

Delivery:吸入投与 水素水経口投与 Mechanism:ヒドロキシルラジカル消去 炎症抑制 酸化ストレス ペルオキシナイトライト消去 活性酸素種

Delivery context

This study combines multiple delivery routes. As a general principle, the most efficient route for routine hydrogen intake is inhalation. Inhalation carries explosion risk (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

Safety notes

This study combines multiple delivery routes. As a general principle, the most efficient route for routine hydrogen intake is inhalation. Inhalation carries explosion risk (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

See also:

Cite as: H2 Papers — PMID 41971791. https://h2-papers.org/en/papers/41971791
Source: PubMed PMID 41971791