日本語View as Markdown

Post-COVID-19 fatigue: A systematic review.

COVID-19後疲労に関する系統的レビュー:症状・病因・リスク因子および介入アプローチの概観

review inhalation positive

Abstract

Persistent fatigue following SARS-CoV-2 infection ranks among the most frequently reported long-term complaints. This systematic review searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and PsycInfo, ultimately including 20 studies of moderate-to-high methodological quality encompassing 5,629 adult participants (aged 18–65). Identified risk factors included older age, female sex, severe acute-phase illness, a high comorbidity burden, and a prior diagnosis of depression or anxiety; an autoimmune etiology was also hypothesized. Various interventions were examined, mostly in small uncontrolled settings: a Chinese herbal formulation reduced breathlessness and fatigue; molecular hydrogen (H2) inhalation was associated with improvements in physical capacity (6-minute walk test) and respiratory function; hyperbaric oxygen and enhanced external counterpulsation also yielded fatigue relief; and an 8-week biweekly program combining aerobic exercise, strengthening, diaphragmatic breathing, and mindfulness improved muscle strength and physical function. The authors conclude that larger, well-controlled trials are needed to establish the efficacy of physical and psychological interventions for post-COVID-19 fatigue.

Mechanism

H2 inhalation is proposed to exert antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects, potentially contributing to the observed improvements in physical capacity and respiratory function in post-COVID-19 patients.

Bibliographic

Authors
Joli J, Buck P, Zipfel S, Stengel A
Journal
Front Psychiatry
Year
2022
PMID
36032234
DOI
10.3389/fpsyt.2022.947973
PMC
PMC9403611

Tags

Delivery context

In air, molecular hydrogen is reported to be combustible across approximately **4% (LFL, lower flammability limit) to 75% (UFL, upper flammability limit)**. Among high-concentration hydrogen inhalers, 66% output sits inside this range, and even pure-hydrogen (100%) output forms a 4–75% concentration-gradient layer at the device–air boundary (the UFL 75% paradox). Engineering principle would therefore call for operation below LFL (the classical 4%); that figure, however, was measured under closed, pre-mixed, static conditions. For the open, dynamic inhalation environment, the empirical value reported in the literature is **10%**, which is the figure referenced in practice as the operating ceiling. The 66% / 100% output devices are recorded in the Japanese Consumer Affairs Agency accident-information database, and from these considerations are not recommended.

→ Evidence by delivery route

Safety notes

In air, molecular hydrogen is reported to be combustible across approximately **4% (LFL, lower flammability limit) to 75% (UFL, upper flammability limit)**. Among high-concentration hydrogen inhalers, 66% output sits inside this range, and even pure-hydrogen (100%) output forms a 4–75% concentration-gradient layer at the device–air boundary (the UFL 75% paradox). Engineering principle would therefore call for operation below LFL (the classical 4%); that figure, however, was measured under closed, pre-mixed, static conditions. For the open, dynamic inhalation environment, the empirical value reported in the literature is **10%**, which is the figure referenced in practice as the operating ceiling. The 66% / 100% output devices are recorded in the Japanese Consumer Affairs Agency accident-information database, and from these considerations are not recommended.

See also: