Hydrogen-oxygen mixture inhalation as an adjunctive treatment to home-based exercise in older patients with knee osteoarthritis: an open-label, blinded-endpoint, randomized controlled trial.
高齢者の膝関節症に対する水素・酸素混合ガス吸入と在宅運動の併用効果:オープンラベル・盲検エンドポイント無作為化対照試験
Abstract
This randomized controlled trial enrolled 121 elderly patients with knee osteoarthritis (mean age 81.2 years; 80.2% female) and assigned them to either a hydrogen-oxygen (H-O) inhalation group (60 min/day for 2 weeks, alongside a 12-week home-based exercise program) or an exercise-only control group. The primary endpoint, the WOMAC total score, improved significantly from baseline in both groups, but the between-group difference at week 12 was −5.2 (95% CI −12.1 to 1.7; P = 0.140), falling short of statistical significance. A significant group-by-time interaction (P < 0.001) indicated that H-O inhalation produced more pronounced symptom relief during the initial 2-week period. No between-group differences were detected in inflammatory markers (hs-CRP, NLR, PLR, LMR), physical performance tests, SF-36 quality-of-life scores, exercise adherence, or adverse event rates at week 12. The findings suggest a transient benefit of H-O inhalation in the early phase of a combined exercise regimen, without sustained superiority over exercise alone.
Mechanism
Molecular hydrogen is proposed to scavenge reactive oxygen species and suppress inflammatory mediators, thereby reducing oxidative stress and inflammation in articular tissues, which may underlie the transient symptom relief observed in the early intervention phase.
Bibliographic
- Authors
- Wang CY, Yan M, Li Y, Han L, Wang H, Jia S, et al.
- Journal
- Front Pharmacol
- Year
- 2025
- PMID
- 39950118
- DOI
- 10.3389/fphar.2025.1505922
- PMC
- PMC11821916
Tags
Delivery context
In air, molecular hydrogen is reported to be combustible across approximately **4% (LFL, lower flammability limit) to 75% (UFL, upper flammability limit)**. Among high-concentration hydrogen inhalers, 66% output sits inside this range, and even pure-hydrogen (100%) output forms a 4–75% concentration-gradient layer at the device–air boundary (the UFL 75% paradox). Engineering principle would therefore call for operation below LFL (the classical 4%); that figure, however, was measured under closed, pre-mixed, static conditions. For the open, dynamic inhalation environment, the empirical value reported in the literature is **10%**, which is the figure referenced in practice as the operating ceiling. The 66% / 100% output devices are recorded in the Japanese Consumer Affairs Agency accident-information database, and from these considerations are not recommended.
Safety notes
See also: