日本語View as Markdown

[Efficiency and safety of the integrated use of medical gases thermal heliox, nitric oxide and molecular hydrogen in patients with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease complicated by hypoxemic, hypercapnic respiratory failure and secondary pulmonary arterial hypertension in the post-COVID period].

COVID後期におけるCOPD増悪・低酸素血症・高炭酸ガス血症性呼吸不全・続発性肺動脈性肺高血圧症患者への温熱ヘリオックス・一酸化窒素・分子状水素の複合使用の有効性と安全性

human randomized controlled trial inhalation positive

Abstract

This randomized, parallel-group, controlled study enrolled 100 patients (52 male, 48 female) who had experienced SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and subsequently developed COPD exacerbation (GOLD evidence levels C and D) complicated by hypoxemic-hypercapnic respiratory failure and secondary pulmonary arterial hypertension. Participants were allocated to five groups receiving various combinations of thermal heliox (t-He/O₂), nitric oxide (NO), and molecular hydrogen (H₂) alongside non-invasive ventilation and standard pharmacotherapy. The group receiving all three gases sequentially demonstrated superior outcomes across multiple parameters—including pulmonary gas exchange, acid-base balance, hemodynamics, shunt fraction, and exercise tolerance—compared with groups receiving individual gases or standard care alone. Reductions in hypoxemia and hypercapnia, improvements in vascular endothelial function, and restoration of metabolic indices were observed. No safety concerns were identified with the combined gas regimen.

Mechanism

Sequential administration of H₂, NO, and thermal heliox is proposed to normalize pulmonary gas exchange, increase oxygen delivery to tissues, reduce intrapulmonary shunt fraction, improve vascular endothelial function, and restore metabolic homeostasis through complementary pathophysiological mechanisms.

Bibliographic

Authors
Shogenova LV
Journal
Ter Arkh
Year
2025 (2025-04-15)
PMID
40327618
DOI
10.26442/00403660.2025.03.203131

Tags

Delivery context

In air, molecular hydrogen is reported to be combustible across approximately **4% (LFL, lower flammability limit) to 75% (UFL, upper flammability limit)**. Among high-concentration hydrogen inhalers, 66% output sits inside this range, and even pure-hydrogen (100%) output forms a 4–75% concentration-gradient layer at the device–air boundary (the UFL 75% paradox). Engineering principle would therefore call for operation below LFL (the classical 4%); that figure, however, was measured under closed, pre-mixed, static conditions. For the open, dynamic inhalation environment, the empirical value reported in the literature is **10%**, which is the figure referenced in practice as the operating ceiling. The 66% / 100% output devices are recorded in the Japanese Consumer Affairs Agency accident-information database, and from these considerations are not recommended.

→ Evidence by delivery route

Safety notes

In air, molecular hydrogen is reported to be combustible across approximately **4% (LFL, lower flammability limit) to 75% (UFL, upper flammability limit)**. Among high-concentration hydrogen inhalers, 66% output sits inside this range, and even pure-hydrogen (100%) output forms a 4–75% concentration-gradient layer at the device–air boundary (the UFL 75% paradox). Engineering principle would therefore call for operation below LFL (the classical 4%); that figure, however, was measured under closed, pre-mixed, static conditions. For the open, dynamic inhalation environment, the empirical value reported in the literature is **10%**, which is the figure referenced in practice as the operating ceiling. The 66% / 100% output devices are recorded in the Japanese Consumer Affairs Agency accident-information database, and from these considerations are not recommended.

See also: