日本語View as Markdown

Comparison of hydrogen administration methods in the treatment of radiation-induced heart disease in rats.

放射線誘発性心疾患ラットモデルにおける水素投与経路(水素水摂取vs吸入)の比較検討

animal study mixed routes positive 4%

Abstract

Male Wistar rats subjected to 10 Gy X-ray thoracic irradiation showed marked elevations in lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), catalase, glutathione peroxidase activity, malondialdehyde, superoxide, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in blood plasma or cardiac tissue at 2 and 9 days post-exposure. Both oral intake of hydrogen-rich water (minimum 4 mg/L) and inhalation of 4% H2 gas restored these oxidative stress and inflammatory markers toward baseline values. The Nrf2/Keap1 antioxidative signaling pathway, which was activated by irradiation, was also normalized by both delivery routes. Cardiac damage was attenuated under both conditions, with H2 gas inhalation showing a more pronounced trend; however, the authors note that larger studies are required to achieve statistical significance and clarify underlying mechanisms.

Mechanism

H2 normalizes the irradiation-activated Nrf2/Keap1 antioxidative pathway, reducing lipid peroxidation products, superoxide levels, and TNF-alpha, thereby limiting oxidative and inflammatory damage to cardiac tissue.

Bibliographic

Authors
Kura B, Pavelkova P, Kalocayova B, Sykora M, Vlkovicova J, Kluknavsky M, et al.
Journal
Can J Physiol Pharmacol
Year
2026 (2026-01-01)
PMID
41806364
DOI
10.1139/cjpp-2025-0085

Tags

Delivery context

This study combines multiple delivery routes. As a general principle, the most efficient route for routine hydrogen intake is inhalation. Inhalation carries explosion risk (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

Safety notes

This study combines multiple delivery routes. As a general principle, the most efficient route for routine hydrogen intake is inhalation. Inhalation carries explosion risk (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

See also: