日本語View as Markdown

Role of the Toll Like receptor (TLR) radical cycle in chronic inflammation: possible treatments targeting the TLR4 pathway.

慢性炎症におけるTLR4ラジカルサイクルの役割と分子状水素を含む介入候補のレビュー

review not specified not assessed

Abstract

Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), a component of innate immunity, has been implicated in the pathophysiology of a broad spectrum of conditions including asthma, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, obesity, autoimmune disorders, neuroinflammatory conditions, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, autism, depression, and chronic fatigue syndrome. Environmental triggers such as ozone, atmospheric particulate matter, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from gram-negative bacteria, ionizing radiation, and toluene can activate TLR4 signaling, leading to elevated reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS/RNS) and sustained oxidative-nitrosative stress. This review examines agents capable of attenuating TLR4-mediated inflammatory cascades, including anti-LPS peptides, recombinant factor C, TLR4/MyD88 antagonists such as eritoran, epigallocatechin-3-gallate, 6-shogaol, N-acetylcysteine, melatonin, and molecular hydrogen. The authors propose that a TLR-driven ROS/RNS cycle represents a shared mechanistic pathway across numerous chronic inflammatory conditions, and that modulating this cycle may offer broad benefit.

Mechanism

TLR4 activation drives ROS/RNS overproduction, sustaining a radical cycle that perpetuates chronic inflammation. Molecular hydrogen is identified as a candidate agent capable of interrupting this TLR4-mediated oxidative-nitrosative cascade.

Bibliographic

Authors
Lucas K, Maes M
Journal
Mol Neurobiol
Year
2013
PMID
23436141
DOI
10.1007/s12035-013-8425-7
PMC
PMC7091222

Tags

Disease:うつ・不安 糖尿病・代謝症候群 Mechanism:免疫調節 炎症抑制 酸化ストレス ペルオキシナイトライト消去 活性酸素種

Delivery context

The delivery route is not clearly identifiable from this paper. For hydrogen intake, inhalation is the most efficient route; inhalation, however, carries explosion risk (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are not recommended).

Safety notes

The delivery route is not clearly identifiable from this paper. For hydrogen intake, inhalation is the most efficient route; inhalation, however, carries explosion risk (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are not recommended).

See also:

Other papers on the same disease / condition

Cite as: H2 Papers — PMID 23436141. https://h2-papers.org/en/papers/23436141
Source: PubMed PMID 23436141