Hydrogen Gas Inhalation Attenuates Endothelial Glycocalyx Damage and Stabilizes Hemodynamics in a Rat Hemorrhagic Shock Model.
出血性ショックラットモデルにおける水素ガス吸入による血管内皮グリコカリックス保護と血行動態安定化
Abstract
This study investigated the molecular mechanisms underlying the hemodynamic benefits of hydrogen gas (H2) inhalation in a rat hemorrhagic shock and resuscitation (HS/R) model. Shock was induced by lowering mean arterial pressure to 35 mmHg for 60 minutes, followed by resuscitation. H2 inhalation and xanthine oxidoreductase inhibition (XOR-I) each independently stabilized blood pressure and improved 6-hour survival rates, with additive effects observed when combined. Notably, H2 did not alter XOR enzymatic activity, indicating an XOR-independent mechanism. Plasma TNF-α and syndecan-1 levels were both reduced by H2 inhalation. When anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibody was co-administered, no further benefit from H2 was detected, suggesting that H2 acts primarily by suppressing TNF-α-mediated shedding of syndecan-1 from the endothelial glycocalyx, thereby preserving vascular integrity and hemodynamic function after resuscitation.
Mechanism
H2 inhalation suppresses TNF-α production, thereby inhibiting syndecan-1 shedding from the endothelial glycocalyx. This preserves vascular barrier function and stabilizes hemodynamics after hemorrhagic shock, operating independently of xanthine oxidoreductase activity.
Bibliographic
- Authors
- Tamura T, Sano M, Matsuoka T, Yoshizawa J, Yamamoto R, Katsumata Y, et al.
- Journal
- Shock
- Year
- 2020
- PMID
- 32804466
- DOI
- 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001459
- PMC
- PMC7458091
Tags
Delivery context
In air, molecular hydrogen is reported to be combustible across approximately **4% (LFL, lower flammability limit) to 75% (UFL, upper flammability limit)**. Among high-concentration hydrogen inhalers, 66% output sits inside this range, and even pure-hydrogen (100%) output forms a 4–75% concentration-gradient layer at the device–air boundary (the UFL 75% paradox). Engineering principle would therefore call for operation below LFL (the classical 4%); that figure, however, was measured under closed, pre-mixed, static conditions. For the open, dynamic inhalation environment, the empirical value reported in the literature is **10%**, which is the figure referenced in practice as the operating ceiling. The 66% / 100% output devices are recorded in the Japanese Consumer Affairs Agency accident-information database, and from these considerations are not recommended.
Safety notes
See also: