Molecular hydrogen downregulates acute exhaustive exercise-induced skeletal muscle damage.
分子状水素の吸入が急性疲弊運動による骨格筋損傷を軽減する
Abstract
Acute exhaustive exercise in sedentary rats causes skeletal muscle damage characterized by elevated oxidative stress, inflammatory cytokine release, and apoptotic signaling. This study examined whether inhalation of molecular hydrogen (H2) could mitigate these responses. Sedentary rats ran to exhaustion on a sealed treadmill while breathing either an H2-containing gas mixture or a control gas. Oxidative stress markers (SOD activity, GSH, TBARS), inflammatory markers (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, NF-κB phosphorylation), and apoptotic markers (cleaved caspase-3, Bcl-2, HSP70 expression) were subsequently assessed in skeletal muscle. Exercise alone did not alter SOD activity but elevated TBARS levels; H2 inhalation increased SOD activity and suppressed the TBARS rise. Exercise-induced surges in TNF-α and IL-6, along with NF-κB phosphorylation, were attenuated by H2. Additionally, the exercise-induced increase in cleaved caspase-3 expression was reduced in H2-treated animals. These findings indicate that H2 inhalation effectively suppresses multiple pathways of exercise-induced skeletal muscle damage in unaccustomed organisms.
Mechanism
H2 inhalation enhances SOD activity to reduce lipid peroxidation (TBARS), suppresses NF-κB phosphorylation thereby lowering TNF-α and IL-6 production, and decreases cleaved caspase-3 expression, collectively attenuating exercise-induced skeletal muscle damage.
Bibliographic
- Authors
- Nogueira JE, Amorim MR, Pinto AP, da Rocha AL, da Silva ASR, Branco LGS
- Journal
- Can J Physiol Pharmacol
- Year
- 2021
- PMID
- 33356867
- DOI
- 10.1139/cjpp-2020-0297
Tags
Delivery context
In air, molecular hydrogen is reported to be combustible across approximately **4% (LFL, lower flammability limit) to 75% (UFL, upper flammability limit)**. Among high-concentration hydrogen inhalers, 66% output sits inside this range, and even pure-hydrogen (100%) output forms a 4–75% concentration-gradient layer at the device–air boundary (the UFL 75% paradox). Engineering principle would therefore call for operation below LFL (the classical 4%); that figure, however, was measured under closed, pre-mixed, static conditions. For the open, dynamic inhalation environment, the empirical value reported in the literature is **10%**, which is the figure referenced in practice as the operating ceiling. The 66% / 100% output devices are recorded in the Japanese Consumer Affairs Agency accident-information database, and from these considerations are not recommended.
Safety notes
See also: