日本語View as Markdown

Acute pre-exercise hydrogen rich water intake does not improve running performance at maximal aerobic speed in trained track and field runners: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study.

最大有酸素速度での疲労困憊走行パフォーマンスに対する運動前水素水摂取の効果:無作為化二重盲検プラセボ対照クロスオーバー試験

human randomized controlled trial hydrogen-rich water null

Abstract

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study enrolled 24 trained male track and field runners (mean age 17.5 years, VO2max 55.0 ml·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹) to examine whether pre-exercise hydrogen-rich water (HRW) ingestion influences exhaustive running capacity. Participants consumed 1260 ml of HRW in four divided doses beginning 120 minutes before exercise. The running protocol included a warm-up, a transition phase, and a final phase at each individual's maximal aerobic speed until exhaustion. Compared with placebo, HRW produced no significant differences in time to exhaustion (217 vs. 227 s, p=0.20), post-exercise blood lactate (9.9 vs. 10.1 mmol·L⁻¹, p=0.42), maximal heart rate (186 vs. 186 beats·min⁻¹, p=0.80), or oxygen uptake (53.1 vs. 52.2 ml·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹, p=0.33). No candidate moderator variable correlated significantly with time to exhaustion. The findings indicate an absence of ergogenic benefit from acute pre-exercise HRW consumption in this population.

Mechanism

No specific mechanistic pathway was investigated in this study; the ergogenic potential of HRW on aerobic running performance was assessed at the physiological outcome level without mechanistic analysis.

Bibliographic

Authors
Valenta M, Botek M, Krejčí J, McKune A, Sládečková B, Neuls F, et al.
Journal
PLoS One
Year
2022
PMID
36538554
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0279307
PMC
PMC9767360

Tags

Disease:運動・疲労回復 Delivery:水素水経口投与 Mechanism:酸化ストレス

Delivery context

Hydrogen-rich water is a low-risk delivery route, but the achievable systemic hydrogen dose is bounded. For clinical applications, inhalation is the most efficient route; inhalation, however, carries explosion risk, and concentration matters (empirical LFL of 10% applies to inhalation environments; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

Safety notes

Hydrogen-rich water is a low-risk delivery route, but the achievable systemic hydrogen dose is bounded. For clinical applications, inhalation is the most efficient route; inhalation, however, carries explosion risk, and concentration matters (empirical LFL of 10% applies to inhalation environments; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

See also:

Other papers on the same disease / condition

Cite as: H2 Papers — PMID 36538554. https://h2-papers.org/en/papers/36538554
Source: PubMed PMID 36538554