日本語View as Markdown

Efficacy of inhaled hydrogen on neurological outcome following brain ischaemia during post-cardiac arrest care (HYBRID II): a multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

院外心停止後の脳虚血に対する水素吸入の神経学的転帰への効果(HYBRID II):多施設無作為化二重盲検プラセボ対照試験

human randomized controlled trial inhalation mixed 2%

Abstract

The HYBRID II trial examined whether 18-hour inhalation of 2% molecular hydrogen gas improves outcomes in comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) of cardiogenic origin. Conducted across 15 Japanese hospitals from 2017 to 2021, the study enrolled 73 patients randomised to hydrogen (n=39) or control (n=34) groups. The primary endpoint—proportion achieving Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 1 or 2 at 90 days—was 56% in the hydrogen group versus 39% in controls, a difference that did not reach statistical significance (relative risk 0.72; 95% CI 0.46–1.13; P=0.15). Secondary endpoints showed statistically significant advantages for hydrogen: median modified Rankin Scale scores were 1 versus 5 (P=0.01), and 90-day survival rates were 85% versus 61% (P=0.02). Enrolment was curtailed prematurely due to COVID-19 restrictions, limiting statistical power. The findings suggest a potential benefit of hydrogen inhalation on survival and functional recovery, warranting further adequately powered investigation.

Mechanism

Molecular hydrogen is proposed to selectively scavenge hydroxyl radicals and peroxynitrite generated during ischaemia-reperfusion following cardiac arrest, thereby reducing oxidative neuronal injury and supporting neurological recovery.

Bibliographic

Authors
Tamura T, Suzuki M, Homma K, Sano M
Journal
EClinicalMedicine
Year
2023
PMID
36969346
DOI
10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101907
PMC
PMC10030910

Tags

Disease:虚血再灌流障害 脳卒中・脳虚血 Delivery:吸入投与 Mechanism:ヒドロキシルラジカル消去 炎症抑制 酸化ストレス 活性酸素種

Delivery context

For inhalation applications of molecular hydrogen, the lower flammability limit (LFL) deserves careful handling. The classical 4% figure applies to closed-system mixtures; the practical inhalation-environment threshold is 10%. Even pure-hydrogen output (the UFL 75% paradox) passes through the flammable range at the air–gas boundary. High-concentration (66% / 100%) inhalers are documented in the Japanese Consumer Affairs Agency accident-information database and are not recommended.

Safety notes

For inhalation applications of molecular hydrogen, the lower flammability limit (LFL) deserves careful handling. The classical 4% figure applies to closed-system mixtures; the practical inhalation-environment threshold is 10%. Even pure-hydrogen output (the UFL 75% paradox) passes through the flammable range at the air–gas boundary. High-concentration (66% / 100%) inhalers are documented in the Japanese Consumer Affairs Agency accident-information database and are not recommended.

See also:

Other papers on the same disease / condition

Cite as: H2 Papers — PMID 36969346. https://h2-papers.org/en/papers/36969346
Source: PubMed PMID 36969346