日本語View as Markdown

Combination of Hydrogen Inhalation and Hypothermic Temperature Control After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Post hoc Analysis of the Efficacy of Inhaled Hydrogen on Neurologic Outcome Following Brain Ischemia During PostCardiac Arrest Care II Trial.

院外心停止後における水素吸入と低体温目標体温管理の併用効果:HYBRID II試験の事後解析

human randomized controlled trial inhalation mixed

Abstract

This post hoc analysis examined data from the multicenter HYBRID II randomized controlled trial, focusing on 72 patients with cardiogenic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) managed across 15 Japanese ICUs. Patients received either hydrogen-oxygen mixture or oxygen alone, with target temperature management (TTM) set at either 32–34°C or 35–36°C per institutional protocol. Among patients managed at TTM32–34°C, 68% in the hydrogen group achieved favorable 90-day neurological outcomes versus 38% in the control group (relative risk 1.81; 95% CI 1.05–3.66). Multivariable analysis confirmed that the combination of hydrogen inhalation with TTM32–34°C was independently associated with good neurological outcomes (adjusted odds ratio 16.10; 95% CI 1.88–138.17; p = 0.01). No statistically significant improvement in 90-day survival was observed with the combined approach compared to TTM32–34°C alone (adjusted hazard ratio 0.22; 95% CI 0.05–1.06; p = 0.06). These findings suggest that hydrogen inhalation combined with deeper hypothermia may reduce post-cardiac arrest brain injury.

Mechanism

The combination of hydrogen inhalation, which selectively scavenges reactive oxygen species, and hypothermic temperature management, which suppresses cerebral metabolic demand, is proposed to synergistically reduce post-cardiac arrest brain injury.

Bibliographic

Authors
Tamura T, Narumiya H, Homma K, Suzuki M
Journal
Crit Care Med
Year
2024 (2024-10-01)
PMID
39133068
DOI
10.1097/CCM.0000000000006395
PMC
PMC11392137

Tags

Delivery context

In air, molecular hydrogen is reported to be combustible across approximately **4% (LFL, lower flammability limit) to 75% (UFL, upper flammability limit)**. Among high-concentration hydrogen inhalers, 66% output sits inside this range, and even pure-hydrogen (100%) output forms a 4–75% concentration-gradient layer at the device–air boundary (the UFL 75% paradox). Engineering principle would therefore call for operation below LFL (the classical 4%); that figure, however, was measured under closed, pre-mixed, static conditions. For the open, dynamic inhalation environment, the empirical value reported in the literature is **10%**, which is the figure referenced in practice as the operating ceiling. The 66% / 100% output devices are recorded in the Japanese Consumer Affairs Agency accident-information database, and from these considerations are not recommended.

→ Evidence by delivery route

Safety notes

In air, molecular hydrogen is reported to be combustible across approximately **4% (LFL, lower flammability limit) to 75% (UFL, upper flammability limit)**. Among high-concentration hydrogen inhalers, 66% output sits inside this range, and even pure-hydrogen (100%) output forms a 4–75% concentration-gradient layer at the device–air boundary (the UFL 75% paradox). Engineering principle would therefore call for operation below LFL (the classical 4%); that figure, however, was measured under closed, pre-mixed, static conditions. For the open, dynamic inhalation environment, the empirical value reported in the literature is **10%**, which is the figure referenced in practice as the operating ceiling. The 66% / 100% output devices are recorded in the Japanese Consumer Affairs Agency accident-information database, and from these considerations are not recommended.

See also: