Molecular Hydrogen Affords Similar Neuroprotection to Therapeutic Hypothermia in a Porcine Model of Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy.
新生児低酸素性虚血性脳症ブタモデルにおける分子状水素吸入と低体温療法の神経保護効果の比較
Abstract
Using a translational newborn pig model of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), piglets underwent 20 minutes of asphyxia via a hypoxic/hypercapnic gas mixture and were then reoxygenated and observed for 48 hours. Animals were randomly allocated to normothermia, continuous 2.1% H2 inhalation, or hypothermia (33.5°C for 37 hours with gradual rewarming) groups. Electroencephalography (EEG), visual evoked potentials (VEPs), and neuropathological assessments were performed. Hypothermia abolished post-asphyxia seizures and shortened VEP latency, whereas H2 inhalation delayed seizure onset and elevated quantitative EEG complexity markers. Neuropathological analysis showed severe thalamic damage in normothermic controls; both H2 and hypothermia significantly reduced this injury. Neocortical, hippocampal, and basal ganglia damage was comparatively mild and unaffected by either intervention. These results indicate that continuous H2 inhalation achieves neuroprotection in the thalamus comparable to hypothermia, while also producing distinct electrophysiological effects.
Mechanism
Inhaled H2 is thought to reduce oxidative stress and neuroinflammation following hypoxic-ischemic injury, thereby attenuating thalamic neuronal death and preserving electrophysiological signal complexity as reflected in quantitative EEG measures.
Bibliographic
- Authors
- Balog E, Remzső G, Tóth-Szűki V, Rózsa É, Kovács V, Domoki F
- Journal
- Antioxidants (Basel)
- Year
- 2025 (2025-11-25)
- PMID
- 41462605
- DOI
- 10.3390/antiox14121405
- PMC
- PMC12729368
Tags
Delivery context
In air, molecular hydrogen is reported to be combustible across approximately **4% (LFL, lower flammability limit) to 75% (UFL, upper flammability limit)**. Among high-concentration hydrogen inhalers, 66% output sits inside this range, and even pure-hydrogen (100%) output forms a 4–75% concentration-gradient layer at the device–air boundary (the UFL 75% paradox). Engineering principle would therefore call for operation below LFL (the classical 4%); that figure, however, was measured under closed, pre-mixed, static conditions. For the open, dynamic inhalation environment, the empirical value reported in the literature is **10%**, which is the figure referenced in practice as the operating ceiling. The 66% / 100% output devices are recorded in the Japanese Consumer Affairs Agency accident-information database, and from these considerations are not recommended.
Safety notes
See also: