Protective effects of hydrogen gas on murine polymicrobial sepsis via reducing oxidative stress and HMGB1 release.
水素ガス吸入による多菌性敗血症マウスモデルへの保護効果:酸化ストレスおよびHMGB1放出の抑制を介したメカニズム
Abstract
Sepsis remains a leading cause of mortality in intensive care settings, with excessive reactive oxygen species production central to its pathophysiology. Using a cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) mouse model, this study examined whether H2 gas inhalation could confer protection against sepsis-related organ damage. Inhalation of 2% H2 initiated at 1 or 6 hours post-CLP significantly improved survival in both moderate and severe CLP groups, with effects dependent on concentration and timing. Multiple organ injury markers—including lung myeloperoxidase activity, wet-to-dry weight ratio, bronchoalveolar lavage protein levels, serum biochemical parameters, and histopathological scores—were substantially reduced by H2 inhalation at 24 hours post-CLP. Mechanistically, H2 exposure was associated with decreased oxidative product levels, elevated antioxidant enzyme activities, and lower concentrations of high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) in both serum and tissue. These findings suggest that H2 inhalation may offer a protective approach against sepsis-induced organ dysfunction.
Mechanism
H2 selectively scavenges hydroxyl radicals, reducing oxidative damage while enhancing antioxidant enzyme activity. Concurrently, it suppresses the release of HMGB1, a late-phase inflammatory mediator, thereby limiting multi-organ injury in sepsis.
Bibliographic
- Authors
- Xie K, Yu Y, Pei Y, Hou L, Chen SL, Xiong L, et al.
- Journal
- Shock
- Year
- 2010
- PMID
- 19997046
- DOI
- 10.1097/SHK.0b013e3181cdc4ae
Tags
Delivery context
In air, molecular hydrogen is reported to be combustible across approximately **4% (LFL, lower flammability limit) to 75% (UFL, upper flammability limit)**. Among high-concentration hydrogen inhalers, 66% output sits inside this range, and even pure-hydrogen (100%) output forms a 4–75% concentration-gradient layer at the device–air boundary (the UFL 75% paradox). Engineering principle would therefore call for operation below LFL (the classical 4%); that figure, however, was measured under closed, pre-mixed, static conditions. For the open, dynamic inhalation environment, the empirical value reported in the literature is **10%**, which is the figure referenced in practice as the operating ceiling. The 66% / 100% output devices are recorded in the Japanese Consumer Affairs Agency accident-information database, and from these considerations are not recommended.
Safety notes
See also: