日本語View as Markdown

Pilot study of H₂ therapy in Parkinson's disease: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

パーキンソン病に対する水素水摂取の有効性:無作為化二重盲検プラセボ対照パイロット試験

human randomized controlled trial hydrogen-rich water positive

Abstract

Oxidative stress is implicated in Parkinson's disease (PD) progression, and molecular hydrogen has demonstrated antioxidant properties in preclinical models. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study enrolled 17 Japanese PD patients receiving levodopa, who consumed either 1,000 mL/day of hydrogen-rich water or placebo water over 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) score. The hydrogen-rich water group (n=9) showed a median UPDRS improvement of −1.0 (mean −5.7 ± 8.4), while the placebo group (n=8) showed a median worsening of 4.5 (mean 4.1 ± 9.2). The between-group difference reached statistical significance (P<0.05) despite the small sample size and limited duration. No safety concerns were identified.

Mechanism

Molecular hydrogen is proposed to selectively neutralize reactive oxygen species, particularly hydroxyl radicals, thereby reducing the oxidative stress implicated in Parkinson's disease pathology.

Bibliographic

Authors
Yoritaka A, Takanashi M, Hirayama M, Nakahara T, Ohta S, Hattori N
Journal
Mov Disord
Year
2013
PMID
23400965
DOI
10.1002/mds.25375

Tags

Disease:パーキンソン病 Delivery:水素水経口投与 Mechanism:抗酸化酵素 ヒドロキシルラジカル消去 炎症抑制 酸化ストレス 活性酸素種

Delivery context

Hydrogen-rich water is a low-risk delivery route, but the achievable systemic hydrogen dose is bounded. For clinical applications, inhalation is the most efficient route; inhalation, however, carries explosion risk, and concentration matters (empirical LFL of 10% applies to inhalation environments; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

Safety notes

Hydrogen-rich water is a low-risk delivery route, but the achievable systemic hydrogen dose is bounded. For clinical applications, inhalation is the most efficient route; inhalation, however, carries explosion risk, and concentration matters (empirical LFL of 10% applies to inhalation environments; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

See also:

Other papers on the same disease / condition

Cite as: H2 Papers — PMID 23400965. https://h2-papers.org/en/papers/23400965
Source: PubMed PMID 23400965