Combination therapy with nitric oxide and molecular hydrogen in a murine model of acute lung injury.
急性肺傷害マウスモデルにおける一酸化窒素と水素ガスの併用吸入効果の検討
Abstract
Using a mouse model of acute lung injury (ALI) induced by intratracheal lipopolysaccharide (LPS) administration, this study examined the effects of inhaled nitric oxide (NO at 20 ppm), hydrogen gas (H2 at 2%), and their combination over a 3-hour period beginning 5 minutes post-LPS. Both single-agent inhalations improved histopathological scores, wet-to-dry weight ratios, oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2), and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) protein levels. Notably, nitrotyrosine accumulation in lung tissue—elevated by NO inhalation alone—was markedly reduced when H2 was co-administered, consistent with H2-mediated peroxynitrite scavenging. The combined regimen produced greater suppression of neutrophil recruitment, myeloperoxidase activity, pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, HMGB1), chemokines, NF-κB activation, and pulmonary cell apoptosis compared with either agent alone. Protective effects were also observed in a polymicrobial sepsis model, and even subthreshold concentrations of both gases in combination retained significant efficacy, suggesting additive or synergistic interactions between NO and H2 in attenuating ALI.
Mechanism
H2 scavenges peroxynitrite generated from inhaled NO, reducing nitrotyrosine formation in lung tissue. This, combined with suppression of NF-κB activation and attenuation of apoptotic signaling, collectively diminishes neutrophil-driven inflammatory injury in the lung.
Bibliographic
- Authors
- Liu H, Liang X, Wang D, Zhang H, Liu L, Chen H, et al.
- Journal
- Shock
- Year
- 2015
- PMID
- 25643010
- DOI
- 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000316
Tags
Delivery context
In air, molecular hydrogen is reported to be combustible across approximately **4% (LFL, lower flammability limit) to 75% (UFL, upper flammability limit)**. Among high-concentration hydrogen inhalers, 66% output sits inside this range, and even pure-hydrogen (100%) output forms a 4–75% concentration-gradient layer at the device–air boundary (the UFL 75% paradox). Engineering principle would therefore call for operation below LFL (the classical 4%); that figure, however, was measured under closed, pre-mixed, static conditions. For the open, dynamic inhalation environment, the empirical value reported in the literature is **10%**, which is the figure referenced in practice as the operating ceiling. The 66% / 100% output devices are recorded in the Japanese Consumer Affairs Agency accident-information database, and from these considerations are not recommended.
Safety notes
See also: