日本語View as Markdown

A systematic review of neuroprotective strategies after cardiac arrest: from bench to bedside (part II-comprehensive protection).

心停止後の神経保護戦略に関する系統的レビュー:基礎から臨床へ(第II部:包括的保護)

review not specified not assessed

Abstract

Neurocognitive impairment is a major source of morbidity among cardiac arrest survivors. This systematic review examined neuroprotective strategies targeting multiple stages of the neuropathological cascade following global cerebral ischemia. Pharmaceutical candidates reviewed included adenosine, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), glycine-proline-glutamate, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), and estrogen; preclinical data for these agents were suggestive but inconclusive. Among medical gases evaluated in experimental models—hydrogen sulfide, hyperbaric oxygen, and molecular hydrogen—hyperbaric oxygen and molecular hydrogen demonstrated encouraging outcomes. The authors conclude that multi-target neuroprotective approaches hold promise for improving neurological recovery and survival, though clinical translation requires additional investigation.

Mechanism

Molecular hydrogen and hyperbaric oxygen are proposed to confer neuroprotection by modulating multiple steps within the neuropathological cascade triggered by global cerebral ischemia following cardiac arrest, though precise mechanistic details remain under investigation.

Bibliographic

Authors
Huang L, Applegate PM, Gatling JW, Mangus DB, Zhang JH, Applegate RL
Journal
Med Gas Res
Year
2014
PMID
25671079
DOI
10.1186/2045-9912-4-10
PMC
PMC4322492

Tags

Disease:認知機能低下 虚血再灌流障害 脳卒中・脳虚血 Mechanism:炎症抑制 Nrf2 経路 酸化ストレス 活性酸素種

Delivery context

The delivery route is not clearly identifiable from this paper. For hydrogen intake, inhalation is the most efficient route; inhalation, however, carries explosion risk (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are not recommended).

Safety notes

The delivery route is not clearly identifiable from this paper. For hydrogen intake, inhalation is the most efficient route; inhalation, however, carries explosion risk (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are not recommended).

See also:

Other papers on the same disease / condition

Cite as: H2 Papers — PMID 25671079. https://h2-papers.org/en/papers/25671079
Source: PubMed PMID 25671079