日本語View as Markdown

Efficacy of inhaled HYdrogen on neurological outcome following BRain Ischemia During post-cardiac arrest care (HYBRID II trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

心停止後症候群患者における水素ガス吸入の神経学的転帰への有効性を検討する多施設無作為化対照試験(HYBRID IIプロトコル)

human randomized controlled trial inhalation not assessed 2%

Abstract

This paper describes the protocol for the HYBRID II trial, a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized study enrolling 360 comatose adults (Glasgow Coma Scale score below 8) resuscitated after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac origin. Participants are allocated 1:1 to receive either 2% hydrogen gas combined with 24–50% oxygen, or oxygen alone, delivered via mechanical ventilation for 18 hours post-admission. All patients also receive multidisciplinary post-arrest care including targeted temperature management at 33–36°C. The primary endpoint is 90-day neurological outcome assessed by the Cerebral Performance Categories scale. Secondary endpoints include 90-day survival and additional neurological measures. The trial is powered at 80% to detect a 15-percentage-point improvement in favorable neurological outcomes (CPC 1–2), from 50% to 65%, at a significance level of 0.05. Prior animal and pilot human data supported the feasibility and safety of this approach.

Mechanism

Hydrogen gas is proposed to selectively scavenge reactive oxygen species, particularly hydroxyl radicals, thereby reducing cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury occurring after cardiac arrest and resuscitation.

Bibliographic

Authors
Tamura T, Hayashida K, Sano M, Onuki S, Suzuki M
Journal
Trials
Year
2017 (2017-10-23)
PMID
29058596
DOI
10.1186/s13063-017-2246-3
PMC
PMC5651618

Tags

Delivery context

In air, molecular hydrogen is reported to be combustible across approximately **4% (LFL, lower flammability limit) to 75% (UFL, upper flammability limit)**. Among high-concentration hydrogen inhalers, 66% output sits inside this range, and even pure-hydrogen (100%) output forms a 4–75% concentration-gradient layer at the device–air boundary (the UFL 75% paradox). Engineering principle would therefore call for operation below LFL (the classical 4%); that figure, however, was measured under closed, pre-mixed, static conditions. For the open, dynamic inhalation environment, the empirical value reported in the literature is **10%**, which is the figure referenced in practice as the operating ceiling. The 66% / 100% output devices are recorded in the Japanese Consumer Affairs Agency accident-information database, and from these considerations are not recommended.

→ Evidence by delivery route

Safety notes

In air, molecular hydrogen is reported to be combustible across approximately **4% (LFL, lower flammability limit) to 75% (UFL, upper flammability limit)**. Among high-concentration hydrogen inhalers, 66% output sits inside this range, and even pure-hydrogen (100%) output forms a 4–75% concentration-gradient layer at the device–air boundary (the UFL 75% paradox). Engineering principle would therefore call for operation below LFL (the classical 4%); that figure, however, was measured under closed, pre-mixed, static conditions. For the open, dynamic inhalation environment, the empirical value reported in the literature is **10%**, which is the figure referenced in practice as the operating ceiling. The 66% / 100% output devices are recorded in the Japanese Consumer Affairs Agency accident-information database, and from these considerations are not recommended.

See also: