日本語View as Markdown

Hydrogen-rich saline may be an effective and specific novel treatment for osteoradionecrosis of the jaw.

水素富化生理食塩水による顎骨放射線壊死への応用可能性に関する考察

letter injection / infusion not assessed

Abstract

Osteoradionecrosis of the jaw is a severe complication arising after radiotherapy for head and neck cancers. The predominant mechanism underlying radiation-induced tissue damage involves hydroxyl radicals produced through radiolysis of water. Molecular hydrogen selectively neutralizes cytotoxic reactive oxygen species, particularly hydroxyl radicals, without disturbing normal redox signaling. Hydrogen-rich saline, a convenient delivery form of molecular hydrogen, has demonstrated beneficial outcomes across various experimental models including metabolic syndrome, cerebral and hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury, and obstructive jaundice-related liver damage. Based on these observations, the authors propose the hypothesis that hydrogen-rich saline could serve as an effective and targeted approach for both preventing and managing osteoradionecrosis of the jaw, warranting further experimental and clinical investigation.

Mechanism

Molecular hydrogen is proposed to selectively scavenge hydroxyl radicals generated by radiation-induced radiolysis of water, thereby reducing oxidative cellular damage associated with osteoradionecrosis of the jaw.

Bibliographic

Authors
Chen Y, Zong C, Guo Y, Tian L
Journal
Ther Clin Risk Manag
Year
2015
PMID
26508867
DOI
10.2147/TCRM.S90770
PMC
PMC4610769

Tags

Delivery context

Intravenous hydrogen-saline infusion is a clinic-only route and is not viable for everyday self-administration. For routine hydrogen intake, inhalation is the most practical route, but inhalation carries explosion risk and concentration matters (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration 66% / 100% devices are not recommended).

→ Evidence by delivery route

Safety notes

Intravenous hydrogen-saline infusion is a clinic-only route and is not viable for everyday self-administration. For routine hydrogen intake, inhalation is the most practical route, but inhalation carries explosion risk and concentration matters (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration 66% / 100% devices are not recommended).

See also: