Hydrogen Inhalation is Superior to Mild Hypothermia in Improving Cardiac Function and Neurological Outcome in an Asphyxial Cardiac Arrest Model of Rats.
窒息性心停止ラットモデルにおける水素吸入と軽度低体温療法の心機能・神経学的転帰への効果比較
Abstract
Using a rat model of asphyxial cardiac arrest, this study compared three post-resuscitation interventions: inhalation of 2% H2 in oxygen for 1 hour, mild hypothermia maintained for 2 hours, and a normothermic control. Serum cardiac troponin T and S100B levels declined in both the H2 and hypothermia groups relative to controls. However, left ventricular ejection fraction, cardiac work index, and neurological deficit scores were significantly more favorable in the H2 inhalation group than in either comparator. The 96-hour survival rate reached 75.0% with H2 inhalation, compared with 45.8% under hypothermia and 33.3% in controls; no statistically significant difference was detected between the hypothermia and control groups. These findings indicate that brief H2 inhalation following cardiopulmonary resuscitation confers greater cardioprotective and neuroprotective benefit than mild hypothermia in this experimental setting.
Mechanism
Inhalation of 2% H2 reduced serum markers of myocardial injury (troponin T) and brain damage (S100B) after resuscitation, suggesting that selective scavenging of reactive oxygen species underlies the observed cardioprotective and neuroprotective effects.
Bibliographic
- Authors
- Wang P, Jia L, Chen B, Zhang LL, Liu J, Long J, et al.
- Journal
- Shock
- Year
- 2016
- PMID
- 26849632
- DOI
- 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000585
Tags
Delivery context
In air, molecular hydrogen is reported to be combustible across approximately **4% (LFL, lower flammability limit) to 75% (UFL, upper flammability limit)**. Among high-concentration hydrogen inhalers, 66% output sits inside this range, and even pure-hydrogen (100%) output forms a 4–75% concentration-gradient layer at the device–air boundary (the UFL 75% paradox). Engineering principle would therefore call for operation below LFL (the classical 4%); that figure, however, was measured under closed, pre-mixed, static conditions. For the open, dynamic inhalation environment, the empirical value reported in the literature is **10%**, which is the figure referenced in practice as the operating ceiling. The 66% / 100% output devices are recorded in the Japanese Consumer Affairs Agency accident-information database, and from these considerations are not recommended.
Safety notes
See also: