日本語View as Markdown

Hydrogen-Rich Saline as an Innovative Therapy for Cataract: A Hypothesis.

水素豊富生理食塩水による白内障への新たなアプローチ:仮説の提唱

other injection / infusion not assessed

Abstract

Cataract remains the foremost cause of irreversible vision loss globally, with oxidative stress recognized as a central contributor to lens opacification. Excess reactive oxygen species (ROS) inflict damage on proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids within ocular tissues, accelerating cataract formation. Molecular hydrogen selectively neutralizes highly cytotoxic ROS, particularly the hydroxyl radical, and unlike conventional antioxidants, it can permeate biological membranes and reach subcellular compartments including mitochondria and the nucleus. This paper presents a hypothesis that hydrogen-rich saline may protect the lens from oxidative damage, and calls for further investigation into the underlying biological mechanisms. Evidence from animal and human studies on other pathologies supports the plausibility of this approach.

Mechanism

Molecular hydrogen is proposed to selectively scavenge hydroxyl radicals and other cytotoxic ROS, penetrating biomembranes to reach mitochondria and the nucleus, thereby reducing oxidative damage to lens proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids.

Bibliographic

Authors
Qin L, Tao Y, Wang L, Chen H, Liu Y, Huang Y
Journal
Med Sci Monit
Year
2016 (2016-09-08)
PMID
27606690
DOI
10.12659/msm.899807
PMC
PMC5019135

Tags

Disease:網膜疾患 Delivery:点滴投与 Mechanism:抗酸化酵素 ヒドロキシルラジカル消去 炎症抑制 ミトコンドリア 酸化ストレス 活性酸素種

Delivery context

Intravenous hydrogen-saline infusion is a clinic-only route and is not viable for everyday self-administration. For routine hydrogen intake, inhalation is the most practical route, but inhalation carries explosion risk and concentration matters (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration 66% / 100% devices are not recommended).

Safety notes

Intravenous hydrogen-saline infusion is a clinic-only route and is not viable for everyday self-administration. For routine hydrogen intake, inhalation is the most practical route, but inhalation carries explosion risk and concentration matters (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration 66% / 100% devices are not recommended).

See also:

Other papers on the same disease / condition

Cite as: H2 Papers — PMID 27606690. https://h2-papers.org/en/papers/27606690
Source: PubMed PMID 27606690