日本語View as Markdown

A New Approach for the Prevention and Treatment of Cardiovascular Disorders. Molecular Hydrogen Significantly Reduces the Effects of Oxidative Stress.

酸化ストレスを標的とした分子状水素による心血管障害への新たなアプローチ:レビュー

review mixed routes not assessed

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease remains a leading cause of death and disability globally, with redox imbalance and inflammatory dysregulation as central pathological drivers. This review examines preclinical and clinical evidence for molecular hydrogen across a range of cardiovascular conditions, including radiation-induced cardiac injury, ischemia-reperfusion damage, myocardial and cerebral infarction, cardiac preservation, and heart transplantation. Hydrogen is delivered via inhalation, oral hydrogen-rich water, or hydrogen-rich saline injection. Its biological actions include suppression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, attenuation of excess reactive oxygen species, and activation of the Nrf2 antioxidant transcription factor, collectively modulating signal transduction and gene expression. Anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-apoptotic properties have been documented, though precise mechanistic pathways remain incompletely characterized. No clinical toxicity has been reported, and a mild hormetic-like response may partly account for observed benefits. The cumulative evidence suggests potential utility of hydrogen in ROS- and inflammation-driven cardiac pathology.

Mechanism

Molecular hydrogen suppresses pro-inflammatory cytokine production and excess reactive oxygen species while activating the Nrf2 antioxidant transcription factor, thereby modulating downstream signal transduction and gene expression to exert anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic effects.

Bibliographic

Authors
LeBaron TW, Kura B, Kalocayova B, Tribulova N, Slezak J
Journal
Molecules
Year
2019 (2019-05-31)
PMID
31159153
DOI
10.3390/molecules24112076
PMC
PMC6600250

Tags

Disease:心血管 虚血再灌流障害 心筋梗塞 Mechanism:アポトーシス抑制 炎症抑制 Nrf2 経路 酸化ストレス 活性酸素種

Delivery context

This study combines multiple delivery routes. As a general principle, the most efficient route for routine hydrogen intake is inhalation. Inhalation carries explosion risk (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

Safety notes

This study combines multiple delivery routes. As a general principle, the most efficient route for routine hydrogen intake is inhalation. Inhalation carries explosion risk (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

See also:

Other papers on the same disease / condition

Cite as: H2 Papers — PMID 31159153. https://h2-papers.org/en/papers/31159153
Source: PubMed PMID 31159153