日本語View as Markdown

Inhaled Gases as Therapies for Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome: A Narrative Review of Recent Developments.

心停止後症候群に対する吸入ガス療法の最近の動向:ナラティブレビュー

review inhalation not assessed

Abstract

Post-cardiac arrest syndrome (PCAS) arises from whole-body ischemia and subsequent reperfusion, and neurologically intact survival rates remain low despite advances in resuscitation care. Multiple pathological processes contribute to neuronal injury in PCAS, including vasoconstriction, protein modification, mitochondrial respiratory dysfunction, cell death signaling cascades, inflammatory responses, and excessive oxidative stress. This narrative review examines recent basic and clinical research on three inhaled gases—nitric oxide (NO), molecular hydrogen (H2), and xenon (Xe)—each of which has demonstrated cytoprotective properties in the context of PCAS. Although all three gases appear capable of mitigating ischemia-reperfusion injury, their underlying mechanisms likely differ. The authors conclude that further preclinical and clinical investigations combining standard post-cardiac arrest care with inhaled gas administration are needed to clarify optimal strategies and improve patient outcomes.

Mechanism

Inhaled H2, NO, and Xe are proposed to reduce ischemia-reperfusion injury following cardiac arrest through complementary but distinct mechanisms involving mitochondrial protection, suppression of oxidative stress, and modulation of inflammatory signaling pathways.

Bibliographic

Authors
Hayashida K, Miyara SJ, Shinozaki K, Takegawa R, Yin T, Rolston DM, et al.
Journal
Front Med (Lausanne)
Year
2020
PMID
33585501
DOI
10.3389/fmed.2020.586229
PMC
PMC7873953

Tags

Delivery context

In air, molecular hydrogen is reported to be combustible across approximately **4% (LFL, lower flammability limit) to 75% (UFL, upper flammability limit)**. Among high-concentration hydrogen inhalers, 66% output sits inside this range, and even pure-hydrogen (100%) output forms a 4–75% concentration-gradient layer at the device–air boundary (the UFL 75% paradox). Engineering principle would therefore call for operation below LFL (the classical 4%); that figure, however, was measured under closed, pre-mixed, static conditions. For the open, dynamic inhalation environment, the empirical value reported in the literature is **10%**, which is the figure referenced in practice as the operating ceiling. The 66% / 100% output devices are recorded in the Japanese Consumer Affairs Agency accident-information database, and from these considerations are not recommended.

→ Evidence by delivery route

Safety notes

In air, molecular hydrogen is reported to be combustible across approximately **4% (LFL, lower flammability limit) to 75% (UFL, upper flammability limit)**. Among high-concentration hydrogen inhalers, 66% output sits inside this range, and even pure-hydrogen (100%) output forms a 4–75% concentration-gradient layer at the device–air boundary (the UFL 75% paradox). Engineering principle would therefore call for operation below LFL (the classical 4%); that figure, however, was measured under closed, pre-mixed, static conditions. For the open, dynamic inhalation environment, the empirical value reported in the literature is **10%**, which is the figure referenced in practice as the operating ceiling. The 66% / 100% output devices are recorded in the Japanese Consumer Affairs Agency accident-information database, and from these considerations are not recommended.

See also: