日本語View as Markdown

Protective Effect of Molecular Hydrogen Following Different Routes of Administration on D-Galactose-Induced Aging Mice.

D-ガラクトース誘発老化マウスにおける異なる投与経路による分子状水素の保護効果

animal study mixed routes positive 4%

Abstract

Using a D-galactose-induced aging mouse model, this study examined the effects of molecular hydrogen delivered via three distinct routes: 4% H2 inhalation, hydrogen-rich water ingestion, and hydrogen-rich saline injection. Plasma aging-related markers—including total antioxidant capacity, advanced glycation end products, tumor necrosis factor-α, free fatty acids, and alanine aminotransferase—showed improvement across all routes. In liver, brain, and heart tissues, malondialdehyde levels declined and superoxide dismutase activity increased, indicating reduced oxidative stress. Among the three routes, 4% H2 inhalation appeared to achieve the highest H2 uptake and showed superior efficacy on certain tissue-specific oxidative stress markers; however, the other two routes demonstrated comparable outcomes across most measured endpoints. These findings suggest that molecular hydrogen can suppress oxidative stress associated with D-galactose-induced aging regardless of the administration route employed.

Mechanism

Molecular hydrogen is proposed to directly scavenge reactive oxygen species, thereby reducing lipid peroxidation (MDA) and enhancing superoxide dismutase activity, while also suppressing TNF-α-mediated inflammatory signaling to attenuate oxidative stress-associated aging.

Bibliographic

Authors
Liu B, Xie Y, Chen J, Xue J, Zhang XQ, Zhao M, et al.
Journal
J Inflamm Res
Year
2021
PMID
34737603
DOI
10.2147/JIR.S332286
PMC
PMC8558637

Tags

Delivery context

This study combines multiple delivery routes. As a general principle, the most efficient route for routine hydrogen intake is inhalation. Inhalation carries explosion risk (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

Safety notes

This study combines multiple delivery routes. As a general principle, the most efficient route for routine hydrogen intake is inhalation. Inhalation carries explosion risk (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

See also: