日本語View as Markdown

Hydrogen Promotes the M1 Macrophage Conversion During the Polarization of Macrophages in Necrotizing Enterocolitis.

壊死性腸炎におけるマクロファージ極性化過程でのM1マクロファージ変換に対する水素の影響

animal study animal model positive

Abstract

Using a necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) mouse model alongside RAW264.7 cells and bone marrow-derived macrophages, this study examined how hydrogen influences macrophage polarization. M1 and M2 macrophages were successfully induced, and cytokine profiles, CD16/32, and CD206 expression were assessed by quantitative PCR and flow cytometry. Hydrogen exposure reduced pro-inflammatory cytokines and CD16/32 expression in M1 macrophages, with suppression of CD16/32 also observed in lamina propria-derived macrophages but not in other tissues. Western blot analysis revealed that nuclear NF-κB p65 levels were diminished in both M1 macrophages and the distal ileum of NEC mice. Histological evaluation confirmed a reduction in NEC severity following hydrogen administration. These findings indicate that hydrogen modulates M1 macrophage polarization via NF-κB p65 nuclear suppression, thereby attenuating intestinal inflammation in NEC.

Mechanism

Hydrogen suppresses nuclear translocation of NF-κB p65 in M1 macrophages, leading to reduced pro-inflammatory cytokine production and decreased CD16/32 expression, thereby diminishing intestinal inflammation in necrotizing enterocolitis.

Bibliographic

Authors
Yu S, Lv Z, Gao Z, Shi J, Sheng Q, Zheng L, et al.
Journal
Front Pediatr
Year
2021
PMID
34869093
DOI
10.3389/fped.2021.710382
PMC
PMC8635714

Tags

Disease:腸管障害 Mechanism:アポトーシス抑制 免疫調節 炎症抑制 酸化ストレス 活性酸素種

Delivery context

This study is at the animal-experiment stage. For human application, inhalation is the most promising delivery route, but inhalation carries explosion risk and concentration matters (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

Safety notes

This study is at the animal-experiment stage. For human application, inhalation is the most promising delivery route, but inhalation carries explosion risk and concentration matters (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

See also:

Other papers on the same disease / condition

Cite as: H2 Papers — PMID 34869093. https://h2-papers.org/en/papers/34869093
Source: PubMed PMID 34869093