日本語View as Markdown

Hydrogen combined with needle-embedding therapy alleviates traumatic brain injury by inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome activation via STING signaling pathway.

水素と埋没針療法の併用が外傷性脳損傷においてSTINGシグナル経路を介したNLRP3インフラマソーム活性化を抑制する機序の解明

animal study mixed routes positive

Abstract

Using a controlled cortical impact (CCI) mouse model of traumatic brain injury (TBI), this study examined the effects of molecular hydrogen (H), needle-embedding therapy (NET), and their combination (H+NET). Assessments included neurological severity scoring, Nissl staining, TUNEL apoptosis assay, ELISA for ATP, adenosine, and inflammatory cytokines, qRT-PCR for inflammatory gene expression, and immunofluorescence and Western blot for NLRP3 inflammasome and STING pathway proteins. CCI induction elevated microglial activation, NLRP3 inflammasome activity, and STING signaling. H alone or NET alone partially reduced brain edema and neuroinflammation. However, the H+NET combination produced significantly greater suppression of NLRP3 inflammasome activation and STING pathway signaling, accompanied by more pronounced reductions in brain water content and inflammatory cytokine levels compared with either monotherapy.

Mechanism

The combination of hydrogen and needle-embedding therapy suppresses the STING signaling pathway, thereby inhibiting downstream NLRP3 inflammasome activation, reducing microglial-mediated neuroinflammation, and alleviating cerebral edema in TBI.

Bibliographic

Authors
Wu F, Su WJ, Wang X, Wang CY, Sun YP, Wang B
Journal
Cytokine
Year
2025
PMID
40187069
DOI
10.1016/j.cyto.2025.156931

Tags

Disease:脊髄損傷 Mechanism:アポトーシス抑制 免疫調節 炎症抑制 ミトコンドリア 酸化ストレス 活性酸素種

Delivery context

This study combines multiple delivery routes. As a general principle, the most efficient route for routine hydrogen intake is inhalation. Inhalation carries explosion risk (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

Safety notes

This study combines multiple delivery routes. As a general principle, the most efficient route for routine hydrogen intake is inhalation. Inhalation carries explosion risk (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

See also:

Other papers on the same disease / condition

Cite as: H2 Papers — PMID 40187069. https://h2-papers.org/en/papers/40187069
Source: PubMed PMID 40187069