日本語View as Markdown

[Effects of hydrogen-rich water on the expression of aquaporin 1 in the cerebral cortex of rat with traumatic brain injury].

外傷性脳損傷ラットの大脳皮質におけるアクアポリン1発現に対する水素富化水の影響

animal study injection / infusion positive

Abstract

Using a weight-drop traumatic brain injury (TBI) model in male Sprague-Dawley rats (n=90, three groups of 30), this study examined how intraperitoneal administration of hydrogen-rich water (5 mL/kg daily for 5 days) influenced aquaporin-1 (AQP1) expression and cerebral edema. In TBI animals, AQP1 mRNA and protein levels in the cerebral cortex peaked at 24 hours post-injury (mRNA 2-ΔΔCt: 7.50±0.26; protein gray value: 1.986±0.110) and were accompanied by elevated neurological severity scores (NSS). Hydrogen-rich water administration significantly reduced AQP1 mRNA (5.40±0.21 vs. 7.50±0.26) and protein (1.246±0.137 vs. 1.986±0.110) at 24 hours, attenuated histopathological changes including irregular neuronal arrangement and hemorrhage, and lowered NSS compared with untreated TBI controls. These findings suggest that AQP1 upregulation contributes to post-TBI cerebral edema formation, and that early hydrogen-rich water administration can suppress this response.

Mechanism

TBI induces upregulation of AQP1 mRNA and protein in the cerebral cortex, promoting edema formation. Hydrogen-rich water suppresses this AQP1 overexpression, thereby reducing fluid accumulation and associated neurological deficits.

Bibliographic

Authors
Chen X, Wang D, Liu Y, Yuan J, Zhang H
Journal
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue
Year
2016
PMID
29923387

Tags

Disease:脊髄損傷 Delivery:点滴投与 Mechanism:アポトーシス抑制 炎症抑制 酸化ストレス 活性酸素種

Delivery context

Intravenous hydrogen-saline infusion is a clinic-only route and is not viable for everyday self-administration. For routine hydrogen intake, inhalation is the most practical route, but inhalation carries explosion risk and concentration matters (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration 66% / 100% devices are not recommended).

Safety notes

Intravenous hydrogen-saline infusion is a clinic-only route and is not viable for everyday self-administration. For routine hydrogen intake, inhalation is the most practical route, but inhalation carries explosion risk and concentration matters (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration 66% / 100% devices are not recommended).

See also:

Other papers on the same disease / condition

Cite as: H2 Papers — PMID 29923387. https://h2-papers.org/en/papers/29923387
Source: PubMed PMID 29923387