Therapeutic Effects of Hydrogen Gas Inhalation on Trimethyltin-Induced Neurotoxicity and Cognitive Impairment in the C57BL/6 Mice Model.
トリメチルスズ誘発神経毒性モデルマウスにおける水素ガス吸入の認知機能および酸化ストレスへの影響
Abstract
A trimethyltin (TMT)-induced neurotoxicity model was established in C57BL/6 mice via a single intraperitoneal injection of 2.6 mg/kg TMT. Animals subsequently received 2% H2 gas inhalation for 30 minutes daily over four weeks. Spatial recognition memory assessed by Y-maze was impaired in TMT-only animals but recovered in the H2-treated group. In both serum and brain tissue, levels of ROS, nitric oxide, MDA, Apo-E, Aβ-40, phospho-tau, and Bax were reduced following H2 inhalation, while pro-inflammatory cytokines G-CSF, IL-6, and TNF-α declined significantly. Conversely, Bcl-2 and VEGF expression increased after H2 exposure. Catalase and GPx activities, which were elevated in the TMT-only group, normalized with H2 inhalation. Collectively, these findings indicate that 2% H2 gas inhalation suppresses oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and Alzheimer's disease-related biomarkers while improving cognitive performance in a TMT mouse model, suggesting a potential role for H2 in addressing neurodegenerative conditions involving cognitive decline.
Mechanism
H2 inhalation is proposed to reduce oxidative stress markers (ROS, MDA, NO), suppress pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, G-CSF), downregulate pro-apoptotic Bax, and upregulate anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 and VEGF, collectively providing neuroprotection in TMT-challenged mice.
Bibliographic
- Authors
- Jeong ES, Bajgai J, You IS, Rahman MH, Fadriquela A, Sharma S, et al.
- Journal
- Int J Mol Sci
- Year
- 2021 (2021-12-10)
- PMID
- 34948107
- DOI
- 10.3390/ijms222413313
- PMC
- PMC8703468
Tags
Delivery context
In air, molecular hydrogen is reported to be combustible across approximately **4% (LFL, lower flammability limit) to 75% (UFL, upper flammability limit)**. Among high-concentration hydrogen inhalers, 66% output sits inside this range, and even pure-hydrogen (100%) output forms a 4–75% concentration-gradient layer at the device–air boundary (the UFL 75% paradox). Engineering principle would therefore call for operation below LFL (the classical 4%); that figure, however, was measured under closed, pre-mixed, static conditions. For the open, dynamic inhalation environment, the empirical value reported in the literature is **10%**, which is the figure referenced in practice as the operating ceiling. The 66% / 100% output devices are recorded in the Japanese Consumer Affairs Agency accident-information database, and from these considerations are not recommended.
Safety notes
See also: